Post-publication peer review and the identification of methodological and reporting issues in COVID-19 trials: a qualitative study | BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine

Subscribe
Log In More

Log in via Institution
Log in via OpenAthens

Log in using your username and password
For personal accounts OR managers of institutional accounts

Username *

Password *

Forgot your log in details?Register a new account?
Forgot your user name or password?
Basket
Search More

Search for this keyword

Advanced search

Close More
Main menu

Latest content

Current issue

Archive

Authors

About
Subscribe
Log in More

Log in via Institution
Log in via OpenAthens

Log in using your username and password
For personal accounts OR managers of institutional accounts

Username *

Password *

Forgot your log in details?Register a new account?
Forgot your user name or password?
BMJ Journals More

You are viewing from: Department GEZ-LTA Erasmushogeschool

Citation Tools

Original research

Post-publication peer review and the identification of methodological and reporting issues in COVID-19 trials: a qualitative study

Download to a citation manager

Download the citation for this article by clicking on one of the following citation managers:

Cite this article as:: Davidson M, Korfitsen CB, Riveros C, et al

Post-publication peer review and the identification of methodological and reporting issues in COVID-19 trials: a qualitative study

BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine Published Online First: 20 February 2025. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2024-113068